<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HTC HD2 vs HTC HD mini</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wmpoweruser.com/htc-hd2-vs-htc-hd-mini/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wmpoweruser.com/htc-hd2-vs-htc-hd-mini/</link>
	<description>Windows Phone News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:41:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jos Dewey</title>
		<link>http://wmpoweruser.com/htc-hd2-vs-htc-hd-mini/comment-page-1/#comment-87509</link>
		<dc:creator>Jos Dewey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 23:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wmpoweruser.com/?p=13725#comment-87509</guid>
		<description>Hmm, where is the Start button on-screen on the HD Mini? Have they removed it altogether? 6.5.3 looks a lot nicer without it. 
 
But... looking at this video it reminds me how crappy low-resolution screens are. Never bothered me when I had a QVGA Omnia, but now that I&#039;m on WVGA just seeing how squished everything is on the HD Mini makes me want to barf. Also, agreed that the HD in the name makes no sense... why is it HD, merely because it&#039;s capacitive? No HD screen, no HD video playback, no HD video recording... misleading marketing BS. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, where is the Start button on-screen on the HD Mini? Have they removed it altogether? 6.5.3 looks a lot nicer without it. </p>
<p>But&#8230; looking at this video it reminds me how crappy low-resolution screens are. Never bothered me when I had a QVGA Omnia, but now that I&#039;m on WVGA just seeing how squished everything is on the HD Mini makes me want to barf. Also, agreed that the HD in the name makes no sense&#8230; why is it HD, merely because it&#039;s capacitive? No HD screen, no HD video playback, no HD video recording&#8230; misleading marketing BS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Who?</title>
		<link>http://wmpoweruser.com/htc-hd2-vs-htc-hd-mini/comment-page-1/#comment-87503</link>
		<dc:creator>Who?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 22:26:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wmpoweruser.com/?p=13725#comment-87503</guid>
		<description>&quot;Of course the HD Mini does run Windows Mobile 6.5.3, and update that will hopefully come to the HD2 at some point.&quot; 
 
This from a blog that cooks its own ROMs? Really? The HD2 cannot run 6.5.3 without a carrier or HTC upgrade? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;Of course the HD Mini does run Windows Mobile 6.5.3, and update that will hopefully come to the HD2 at some point.&quot; </p>
<p>This from a blog that cooks its own ROMs? Really? The HD2 cannot run 6.5.3 without a carrier or HTC upgrade?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peterfares</title>
		<link>http://wmpoweruser.com/htc-hd2-vs-htc-hd-mini/comment-page-1/#comment-87501</link>
		<dc:creator>peterfares</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 21:34:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wmpoweruser.com/?p=13725#comment-87501</guid>
		<description>There is no reason to include &quot;HD&quot; in the name of the &quot;HD Mini.&quot;  The whole reason they used HD was because the Touch HD had a large, high resolution screen.  The HD Mini has neither. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no reason to include &quot;HD&quot; in the name of the &quot;HD Mini.&quot;  The whole reason they used HD was because the Touch HD had a large, high resolution screen.  The HD Mini has neither.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 3/11 queries in 0.004 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 334/338 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via WMPoweruser.speedymirror.com

Served from: wmpoweruser.com @ 2012-02-10 18:57:49 -->
