<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Opera Mobile 10 vs Skyfire 1.5 video review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wmpoweruser.com/opera-mobile-10-vs-skyfire-1-5-video-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wmpoweruser.com/opera-mobile-10-vs-skyfire-1-5-video-review/</link>
	<description>Windows Phone News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 20:17:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: manu</title>
		<link>http://wmpoweruser.com/opera-mobile-10-vs-skyfire-1-5-video-review/comment-page-1/#comment-81186</link>
		<dc:creator>manu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 00:09:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wmpoweruser.com/?p=11270#comment-81186</guid>
		<description>i use opera for browsing and skyfire for watching videos. Skyfire seems to load videos faster while on slow wifi connections than my native flash player. I have a nokia e71 and it allows me to have both apps open at the same time. Skyfire is crap to browse, it doesnt resize text so if you wanna read stuff on the net and have a small screen you are doomed. Skyfire videois nothing to write home about anyways, choppy as hell, but For now it gets the job done, and its not like ttheres any alternative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i use opera for browsing and skyfire for watching videos. Skyfire seems to load videos faster while on slow wifi connections than my native flash player. I have a nokia e71 and it allows me to have both apps open at the same time. Skyfire is crap to browse, it doesnt resize text so if you wanna read stuff on the net and have a small screen you are doomed. Skyfire videois nothing to write home about anyways, choppy as hell, but For now it gets the job done, and its not like ttheres any alternative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timi Azeez</title>
		<link>http://wmpoweruser.com/opera-mobile-10-vs-skyfire-1-5-video-review/comment-page-1/#comment-74582</link>
		<dc:creator>Timi Azeez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 18:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wmpoweruser.com/?p=11270#comment-74582</guid>
		<description>skyfire </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>skyfire </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: captobie</title>
		<link>http://wmpoweruser.com/opera-mobile-10-vs-skyfire-1-5-video-review/comment-page-1/#comment-74581</link>
		<dc:creator>captobie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 18:31:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wmpoweruser.com/?p=11270#comment-74581</guid>
		<description>Hmmm, it seems to me that while Skyfire appeared to load faster, it only loaded part of the page, where Opera took longer but loaded the entire page.  I HATE getting that checkerboard pattern on Skyfire, to me it makes Skyfire seem slower, which is why I prefer Opera.   </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm, it seems to me that while Skyfire appeared to load faster, it only loaded part of the page, where Opera took longer but loaded the entire page.  I HATE getting that checkerboard pattern on Skyfire, to me it makes Skyfire seem slower, which is why I prefer Opera.   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 6/11 queries in 0.004 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 332/334 objects using disk: basic

Served from: wmpoweruser.com @ 2012-05-24 21:24:20 -->
