<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windows Mobile 7 coming &#8220;late next year&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wmpoweruser.com/windows-mobile-7-coming-late-next-year/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wmpoweruser.com/windows-mobile-7-coming-late-next-year/</link>
	<description>Windows Phone News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 06:08:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: green card</title>
		<link>http://wmpoweruser.com/windows-mobile-7-coming-late-next-year/comment-page-1/#comment-91234</link>
		<dc:creator>green card</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 07:58:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wmpoweruser.com/?p=11213#comment-91234</guid>
		<description>What would be great (but more than likely just wishful thinking for the moment) is if MS managed to scale down the NT kernel to ARM for a more modern OS rather than trying to build up CE (the approach used in OS X, scaling down BSD, and Android, Linux on ARM).  
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What would be great (but more than likely just wishful thinking for the moment) is if MS managed to scale down the NT kernel to ARM for a more modern OS rather than trying to build up CE (the approach used in OS X, scaling down BSD, and Android, Linux on ARM).  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: poke</title>
		<link>http://wmpoweruser.com/windows-mobile-7-coming-late-next-year/comment-page-1/#comment-74650</link>
		<dc:creator>poke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 09:32:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wmpoweruser.com/?p=11213#comment-74650</guid>
		<description>Sigh!!!! 
 
With all the talk of WM being behind the competition and and 6.5 being just a re-skin (I know this isn&#039;t totally true) you would have thought MS would keep to this schedule. 
 
As someone has already mentioned WM is based on CE. That core (6) has already been completed. I would assume that was the hard part - unless they are now planning on using CE7?? 
 
The only thing I can think of is that there is something major coming WM7 and there better had be. With Balmer already saying WM7 should have been out yesterday how can they allow this to happen. The hype that is Android is only going to get bigger. Forget iPhone - it Android that is doing MS damage right now because their partners development efforts are focused on Android and I guess as HTC&#039;s roadmap and adverts shows their focus is on Android - regardless of what you might say about the HD2. 
 
Where it matters is at the operators (carriers) they all want iPhone and Android right now. There is little talk of WM. What will it be like next year? 6.5.1 wont cut it as an interim. 
 
My upgrade is due in May - unless I see some major WM7 leaks I don&#039;t think i&#039;ll wait and I HTC&#039;s WM roadmap is weak at best (HD2 is a little too big for me). 
 
Sigh!!! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sigh!!!! </p>
<p>With all the talk of WM being behind the competition and and 6.5 being just a re-skin (I know this isn&#039;t totally true) you would have thought MS would keep to this schedule. </p>
<p>As someone has already mentioned WM is based on CE. That core (6) has already been completed. I would assume that was the hard part &#8211; unless they are now planning on using CE7?? </p>
<p>The only thing I can think of is that there is something major coming WM7 and there better had be. With Balmer already saying WM7 should have been out yesterday how can they allow this to happen. The hype that is Android is only going to get bigger. Forget iPhone &#8211; it Android that is doing MS damage right now because their partners development efforts are focused on Android and I guess as HTC&#039;s roadmap and adverts shows their focus is on Android &#8211; regardless of what you might say about the HD2. </p>
<p>Where it matters is at the operators (carriers) they all want iPhone and Android right now. There is little talk of WM. What will it be like next year? 6.5.1 wont cut it as an interim. </p>
<p>My upgrade is due in May &#8211; unless I see some major WM7 leaks I don&#039;t think i&#039;ll wait and I HTC&#039;s WM roadmap is weak at best (HD2 is a little too big for me). </p>
<p>Sigh!!! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jakob</title>
		<link>http://wmpoweruser.com/windows-mobile-7-coming-late-next-year/comment-page-1/#comment-74644</link>
		<dc:creator>Jakob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 08:17:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wmpoweruser.com/?p=11213#comment-74644</guid>
		<description>Microsoft has to make sure that WinMo 7 is a brilliant product. WinMo is generally left behind the other brands right now, and if the new version is not 100% up-to-speed with the competition when it is released, it may be the end of WinMo altogether. 
 
Better to release a good product in a year, than a bad product in half a year. They really have no choice. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft has to make sure that WinMo 7 is a brilliant product. WinMo is generally left behind the other brands right now, and if the new version is not 100% up-to-speed with the competition when it is released, it may be the end of WinMo altogether. </p>
<p>Better to release a good product in a year, than a bad product in half a year. They really have no choice. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seika</title>
		<link>http://wmpoweruser.com/windows-mobile-7-coming-late-next-year/comment-page-1/#comment-74643</link>
		<dc:creator>seika</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 08:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wmpoweruser.com/?p=11213#comment-74643</guid>
		<description>Well, I hope they can add more polishes before the release to bring it to the same level as other OSes in 2011. 
 
If they came out perfectly, but with something the commentators would say &quot;so 2008&quot;, it&#039;ll be another running uphill battle for them. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I hope they can add more polishes before the release to bring it to the same level as other OSes in 2011. </p>
<p>If they came out perfectly, but with something the commentators would say &quot;so 2008&quot;, it&#039;ll be another running uphill battle for them. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bugblatter</title>
		<link>http://wmpoweruser.com/windows-mobile-7-coming-late-next-year/comment-page-1/#comment-74578</link>
		<dc:creator>Bugblatter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 17:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wmpoweruser.com/?p=11213#comment-74578</guid>
		<description>10 developers can produce more than 100 developers. It&#039;s about the level of the developers and the environment they work in. 
 
If you&#039;ve read any of the blogs by MS (often ex) developers and product managers you&#039;ll know that the culture in MS is one of escalating bureaucracy with decisions made by those with the most clout rather than those with the most knowledge and ability. A manager will swoop in, arbitrarily change the requirements, and fly off again. Then along comes another one who&#039;ll change it again. Developers can&#039;t develop as quickly as managers can change their minds. 
 
From what I&#039;ve heard about development on other projects it&#039;s no surprise to me that no matter the resources MS throws at WM7 it&#039;s still massively behind schedule. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>10 developers can produce more than 100 developers. It&#039;s about the level of the developers and the environment they work in. </p>
<p>If you&#039;ve read any of the blogs by MS (often ex) developers and product managers you&#039;ll know that the culture in MS is one of escalating bureaucracy with decisions made by those with the most clout rather than those with the most knowledge and ability. A manager will swoop in, arbitrarily change the requirements, and fly off again. Then along comes another one who&#039;ll change it again. Developers can&#039;t develop as quickly as managers can change their minds. </p>
<p>From what I&#039;ve heard about development on other projects it&#039;s no surprise to me that no matter the resources MS throws at WM7 it&#039;s still massively behind schedule. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rad</title>
		<link>http://wmpoweruser.com/windows-mobile-7-coming-late-next-year/comment-page-1/#comment-74561</link>
		<dc:creator>rad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 13:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wmpoweruser.com/?p=11213#comment-74561</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s mostly because I need something that&#039;ll sync my PIM data with Outlook (without any online connectors in between), which means either WM or iPhone, and from there, only the TP2 has T-Mobile U.S. 3G support.  I also do .NET development, so WM is nice in that I can relatively easily port over functionality from my apps for my own purposes (random robotics projects and such), and easy file system access is nice, though the platform&#039;s limitations mean these things are usually only of marginal utility. 
 
After using WM since 2003, I got an iPhone, which I used (jailbroken, unlocked) on T-Mobile for about 1.5 years before getting the TP2 at launch.  I was hoping WM had evolved enough since WM2003SE and WM5 to make it usable, alongside HTC&#039;s UI replacements, and that it&#039;d be fine for a few months until WM7 launched.  But of course, that&#039;s not happening for yet another year, so even if the HD2 launches here in February, it&#039;s sort of a toss-up, because it&#039;ll probably be running 6.5 for the better portion of a year after launch. 
 
Returning to the iPhone would mean dropping to EDGE on T-Mo US, which might be worth it if the 4G model introduces something interesting enough (especially given that my most common task while not in WiFi range is email, which the iPhone is much faster at getting, and EDGE is fine for (except larger attachments)), but that won&#039;t be coming till June 2010, by which time we&#039;ll probably (hopefully!) have some more info on WM7, so let&#039;s see. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#039;s mostly because I need something that&#039;ll sync my PIM data with Outlook (without any online connectors in between), which means either WM or iPhone, and from there, only the TP2 has T-Mobile U.S. 3G support.  I also do .NET development, so WM is nice in that I can relatively easily port over functionality from my apps for my own purposes (random robotics projects and such), and easy file system access is nice, though the platform&#039;s limitations mean these things are usually only of marginal utility. </p>
<p>After using WM since 2003, I got an iPhone, which I used (jailbroken, unlocked) on T-Mobile for about 1.5 years before getting the TP2 at launch.  I was hoping WM had evolved enough since WM2003SE and WM5 to make it usable, alongside HTC&#039;s UI replacements, and that it&#039;d be fine for a few months until WM7 launched.  But of course, that&#039;s not happening for yet another year, so even if the HD2 launches here in February, it&#039;s sort of a toss-up, because it&#039;ll probably be running 6.5 for the better portion of a year after launch. </p>
<p>Returning to the iPhone would mean dropping to EDGE on T-Mo US, which might be worth it if the 4G model introduces something interesting enough (especially given that my most common task while not in WiFi range is email, which the iPhone is much faster at getting, and EDGE is fine for (except larger attachments)), but that won&#039;t be coming till June 2010, by which time we&#039;ll probably (hopefully!) have some more info on WM7, so let&#039;s see. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baz</title>
		<link>http://wmpoweruser.com/windows-mobile-7-coming-late-next-year/comment-page-1/#comment-74558</link>
		<dc:creator>Baz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 12:27:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wmpoweruser.com/?p=11213#comment-74558</guid>
		<description>If I had such a hard time with WM as you seem to, I think I would have cut my losses and gone with apple by now, from your comment&#039;s, you seem to think much more highly of the iphone OS, is there a particular reason you seemingly persevere in torturing yourself with windows mobile? 
 
Call me silly, but I don&#039;t really understand people using thing&#039;s they don&#039;t really like, it&#039;s personally quite a simple decision, what I like better....I use </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I had such a hard time with WM as you seem to, I think I would have cut my losses and gone with apple by now, from your comment&#039;s, you seem to think much more highly of the iphone OS, is there a particular reason you seemingly persevere in torturing yourself with windows mobile? </p>
<p>Call me silly, but I don&#039;t really understand people using thing&#039;s they don&#039;t really like, it&#039;s personally quite a simple decision, what I like better&#8230;.I use </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rad</title>
		<link>http://wmpoweruser.com/windows-mobile-7-coming-late-next-year/comment-page-1/#comment-74480</link>
		<dc:creator>rad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 22:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wmpoweruser.com/?p=11213#comment-74480</guid>
		<description>See regardless of hardware, though, WM 6.x has other major issues that reskinned UI controls will never fix. 
 
Outlook Mobile is a very poor mobile email client-- it&#039;s terribly slow (again, with full signal on T-Mobile in NYC, iPhone on EDGE is faster than TP2 on 3G) and has broken IMAP support (hardcoded folder share names, incompatible with most Linux IMAP servers).  Office Mobile is also quite poor-- Word can&#039;t display a properly-formatted document for its life, and PowerPoint (and to a lesser degree, Excel) have similar issues.  For content viewing, the iPhone has a much better viewer for Word/Excel/PPT/PDF, and for content creation, there&#039;s QuickOffice Mobile for $9.99 (similar apps on WM like SoftOffice cost $80). 
 
Desktop syncing with WMDC is nice when it works, but it&#039;s highly unreliable-- often it&#039;ll be plugged in and charging but for whatever reason, WMDC won&#039;t see it or sees it but won&#039;t sync.  When taking my phone out in the morning, I never know if it actually synced or not until I check and see if things are missing.  Ironically, the iPhone syncs more reliably with Outlook via iTunes, though granted, it doesn&#039;t sync some obscure contact fields and has a limit to how much text it syncs from the &quot;notes&quot; fields of a contact or appointment. 
 
The paucity of decent third-party apps is a problem on WM.  If basic things like email, office docs, syncing, etc. worked well on WM, I might not mind this as much, but the fact that an iPhone can do all that and so much more (including lots of things that you can&#039;t do in a browser, like control your car via manufacturers&#039; apps, manage a ZipCar, play decent 3D games in downtime (which pretty much don&#039;t exist on WM), and more) just adds insult to injury.  Even basic things like Facebook are not usable on WM (the MS app is trash, and opening up the desktop site in Opera/SkyFire is slow and impractical). 
 
But more than anything else, even on the HD2, WM 6.5 is a highly quirky/buggy OS.  Things randomly happen that shouldn&#039;t-- just like my TP2, for instance, sometimes, even in a full-reception area, it&#039;ll just randomly drop signal and report no service.  Then when you discover it, you can try toggling the phone radio / airplane mode or resetting the phone to fix it, but in the meantime, you&#039;ve missed all calls and texts.  Lag is obviously a huge problem on WM phones-- my TP2 has led to potentially highly dangerous situations, when the messaging app decided to lock up, and I couldn&#039;t send anything for nearly 5 minutes.  Sure, that&#039;s fine for a $5 featurephone, but especially for something targeted at business users, you could be dealing with mission-critical communications, and WM doesn&#039;t cut it.  Thankfully, the HD2 is much better in this regard, simply by throwing so much horsepower at the problem, but even it is not consistently lag-free.  It&#039;s quite telling than a first-gen iPhone, on a 412 MHz ARM11, is more consistently fluid than the HD2, with 1 GHz Snapdragon. 
 
For just another of so many different examples, the HTC SMS app occasionally doesn&#039;t work-- haven&#039;t seen this on the HD2 yet, but on the T-Mo TP2, about 40-50% of the time, sending a text message from the HTC UI gives an error that the phone is not enabled, so you have to switch to the WM SMS UI to send the message, and of course the HTC UI doesn&#039;t support text selection (on the TP2 at least), so you need to remember and retype the message. 
 
So these are the sorts of things that make me hesistant to pick up a US-model HD2 when it hits T-Mo in February.  That would&#039;ve made a lot of sense if WM7 (which will presumably address all these issues) were to arrive in a decent timeframe, so I could wait it out, but now it seems getting an HD2 would entail sticking with WM 6.5 for up to another year, which is torture I&#039;m not putting myself through.  Let&#039;s see how things pan out... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See regardless of hardware, though, WM 6.x has other major issues that reskinned UI controls will never fix. </p>
<p>Outlook Mobile is a very poor mobile email client&#8211; it&#039;s terribly slow (again, with full signal on T-Mobile in NYC, iPhone on EDGE is faster than TP2 on 3G) and has broken IMAP support (hardcoded folder share names, incompatible with most Linux IMAP servers).  Office Mobile is also quite poor&#8211; Word can&#039;t display a properly-formatted document for its life, and PowerPoint (and to a lesser degree, Excel) have similar issues.  For content viewing, the iPhone has a much better viewer for Word/Excel/PPT/PDF, and for content creation, there&#039;s QuickOffice Mobile for $9.99 (similar apps on WM like SoftOffice cost $80). </p>
<p>Desktop syncing with WMDC is nice when it works, but it&#039;s highly unreliable&#8211; often it&#039;ll be plugged in and charging but for whatever reason, WMDC won&#039;t see it or sees it but won&#039;t sync.  When taking my phone out in the morning, I never know if it actually synced or not until I check and see if things are missing.  Ironically, the iPhone syncs more reliably with Outlook via iTunes, though granted, it doesn&#039;t sync some obscure contact fields and has a limit to how much text it syncs from the &quot;notes&quot; fields of a contact or appointment. </p>
<p>The paucity of decent third-party apps is a problem on WM.  If basic things like email, office docs, syncing, etc. worked well on WM, I might not mind this as much, but the fact that an iPhone can do all that and so much more (including lots of things that you can&#039;t do in a browser, like control your car via manufacturers&#039; apps, manage a ZipCar, play decent 3D games in downtime (which pretty much don&#039;t exist on WM), and more) just adds insult to injury.  Even basic things like Facebook are not usable on WM (the MS app is trash, and opening up the desktop site in Opera/SkyFire is slow and impractical). </p>
<p>But more than anything else, even on the HD2, WM 6.5 is a highly quirky/buggy OS.  Things randomly happen that shouldn&#039;t&#8211; just like my TP2, for instance, sometimes, even in a full-reception area, it&#039;ll just randomly drop signal and report no service.  Then when you discover it, you can try toggling the phone radio / airplane mode or resetting the phone to fix it, but in the meantime, you&#039;ve missed all calls and texts.  Lag is obviously a huge problem on WM phones&#8211; my TP2 has led to potentially highly dangerous situations, when the messaging app decided to lock up, and I couldn&#039;t send anything for nearly 5 minutes.  Sure, that&#039;s fine for a $5 featurephone, but especially for something targeted at business users, you could be dealing with mission-critical communications, and WM doesn&#039;t cut it.  Thankfully, the HD2 is much better in this regard, simply by throwing so much horsepower at the problem, but even it is not consistently lag-free.  It&#039;s quite telling than a first-gen iPhone, on a 412 MHz ARM11, is more consistently fluid than the HD2, with 1 GHz Snapdragon. </p>
<p>For just another of so many different examples, the HTC SMS app occasionally doesn&#039;t work&#8211; haven&#039;t seen this on the HD2 yet, but on the T-Mo TP2, about 40-50% of the time, sending a text message from the HTC UI gives an error that the phone is not enabled, so you have to switch to the WM SMS UI to send the message, and of course the HTC UI doesn&#039;t support text selection (on the TP2 at least), so you need to remember and retype the message. </p>
<p>So these are the sorts of things that make me hesistant to pick up a US-model HD2 when it hits T-Mo in February.  That would&#039;ve made a lot of sense if WM7 (which will presumably address all these issues) were to arrive in a decent timeframe, so I could wait it out, but now it seems getting an HD2 would entail sticking with WM 6.5 for up to another year, which is torture I&#039;m not putting myself through.  Let&#039;s see how things pan out&#8230; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MobileSpoon</title>
		<link>http://wmpoweruser.com/windows-mobile-7-coming-late-next-year/comment-page-1/#comment-74479</link>
		<dc:creator>MobileSpoon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 21:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wmpoweruser.com/?p=11213#comment-74479</guid>
		<description>I too was under the impression that Windows Mobile is dying and I still think it&#8217;s an option. 
On the other hand, I just had a chance to use the new HTC HD (2) for a while and I must say that with the amazing capacitive screen and great speed, this phone makes me think there is still a chance to hide WinMo&#8217;s diseases.  
&lt;a href=&quot;http://mobilespoon.blogspot.com/2009/12/one-night-stand-with-htc-hd2.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://mobilespoon.blogspot.com/2009/12/one-night...&lt;/a&gt; 
 
Will it be enough to last for almost a year?  
I&#8217;m not really sure.  
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too was under the impression that Windows Mobile is dying and I still think it&rsquo;s an option.<br />
On the other hand, I just had a chance to use the new HTC HD (2) for a while and I must say that with the amazing capacitive screen and great speed, this phone makes me think there is still a chance to hide WinMo&rsquo;s diseases.<br />
<a href="http://mobilespoon.blogspot.com/2009/12/one-night-stand-with-htc-hd2.html" target="_blank"></a><a href="http://mobilespoon.blogspot.com/2009/12/one-night" rel="nofollow">http://mobilespoon.blogspot.com/2009/12/one-night</a>&#8230; </p>
<p>Will it be enough to last for almost a year?<br />
I&rsquo;m not really sure.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://wmpoweruser.com/windows-mobile-7-coming-late-next-year/comment-page-1/#comment-74458</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 18:14:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wmpoweruser.com/?p=11213#comment-74458</guid>
		<description>Rushed? It will be three years since the iPhone shipped before MS provides its first credible response (no guarantee). And that will be a rev 1 product that will likely be buggy and probably fall short of expectations. 6.5 is crappy and full of bugs because MS did a poor job, not because it didn&#039;t take a long time. Why would any carrier bet on a track record that pathetic? MS should have been out with a new UI within six months of the first iPhone, and WM7 a year ago. Christopher is right. They have share and momentum to lose. And if carriers decide WM is dead then it will be, regardless of whether WM7 is good or not. This isn&#039;t the PC monopoly where MS can screw up Longhorn and then Vista and still survive to ship 7. This is a new frontier where OEMs are even happier to go with someone else, especially when that person has better market pull, a better product, and in Google&#039;s case is free.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rushed? It will be three years since the iPhone shipped before MS provides its first credible response (no guarantee). And that will be a rev 1 product that will likely be buggy and probably fall short of expectations. 6.5 is crappy and full of bugs because MS did a poor job, not because it didn&#8217;t take a long time. Why would any carrier bet on a track record that pathetic? MS should have been out with a new UI within six months of the first iPhone, and WM7 a year ago. Christopher is right. They have share and momentum to lose. And if carriers decide WM is dead then it will be, regardless of whether WM7 is good or not. This isn&#8217;t the PC monopoly where MS can screw up Longhorn and then Vista and still survive to ship 7. This is a new frontier where OEMs are even happier to go with someone else, especially when that person has better market pull, a better product, and in Google&#8217;s case is free.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 9/25 queries in 0.033 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 459/475 objects using disk: basic

Served from: wmpoweruser.com @ 2012-05-25 07:24:25 -->
