<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windows Mobile 7 early build hands-on review, not compatible with old apps</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wmpoweruser.com/windows-mobile-7-early-build-hands-on-review-not-compatible-with-old-apps/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wmpoweruser.com/windows-mobile-7-early-build-hands-on-review-not-compatible-with-old-apps/</link>
	<description>Windows Phone News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 06:08:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anup</title>
		<link>http://wmpoweruser.com/windows-mobile-7-early-build-hands-on-review-not-compatible-with-old-apps/comment-page-1/#comment-78776</link>
		<dc:creator>Anup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 19:07:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wmpoweruser.com/?p=12237#comment-78776</guid>
		<description>huh...i dont like hearing about the fact that WinMo 7 is probably going to break compatibility with older apps! i mean i have spent quite a few bucks on paying for full software PLUS a new HD2 and now MS is saying this?????  
 
if there is no upgrade for the apps, then am stuck with having to full price again...!!! if that happens, then probably i will stick to old 6.5.x and what i have or embrace the dark side and start looking for illegal stuff! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>huh&#8230;i dont like hearing about the fact that WinMo 7 is probably going to break compatibility with older apps! i mean i have spent quite a few bucks on paying for full software PLUS a new HD2 and now MS is saying this?????  </p>
<p>if there is no upgrade for the apps, then am stuck with having to full price again&#8230;!!! if that happens, then probably i will stick to old 6.5.x and what i have or embrace the dark side and start looking for illegal stuff! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Jackson</title>
		<link>http://wmpoweruser.com/windows-mobile-7-early-build-hands-on-review-not-compatible-with-old-apps/comment-page-1/#comment-78735</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 14:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wmpoweruser.com/?p=12237#comment-78735</guid>
		<description>If this is true, then my Touch Pro is probably my last WM phone.  If I have to get all new software, I might as well get a droid so I can at least get the latest google apps since google doesn&#039;t release new stuff on other platforms anymore. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If this is true, then my Touch Pro is probably my last WM phone.  If I have to get all new software, I might as well get a droid so I can at least get the latest google apps since google doesn&#039;t release new stuff on other platforms anymore. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trevor hopkins</title>
		<link>http://wmpoweruser.com/windows-mobile-7-early-build-hands-on-review-not-compatible-with-old-apps/comment-page-1/#comment-78675</link>
		<dc:creator>trevor hopkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 06:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wmpoweruser.com/?p=12237#comment-78675</guid>
		<description>Ok look I love this site, and respect the integrity of it&#039;s articles and understand the nature of rumor chasing. 
 
But cmon. I dont care who this guy is what I am highly skeptical of is him. He referred to Android 3.1./3.2... wow he must be pretty good to know what 3.1 is going to look like. Of course a newer version of CE wouldnt be compatible with old apps, maybe some kind of backend solution.  To me he seems to be regurgitating a bunch of rumors. No screen shots, no noting. No offense but I&#039;m going to completely disregard this article. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok look I love this site, and respect the integrity of it&#039;s articles and understand the nature of rumor chasing. </p>
<p>But cmon. I dont care who this guy is what I am highly skeptical of is him. He referred to Android 3.1./3.2&#8230; wow he must be pretty good to know what 3.1 is going to look like. Of course a newer version of CE wouldnt be compatible with old apps, maybe some kind of backend solution.  To me he seems to be regurgitating a bunch of rumors. No screen shots, no noting. No offense but I&#039;m going to completely disregard this article. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed M.</title>
		<link>http://wmpoweruser.com/windows-mobile-7-early-build-hands-on-review-not-compatible-with-old-apps/comment-page-1/#comment-78648</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 04:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wmpoweruser.com/?p=12237#comment-78648</guid>
		<description>Wishmaster89 (above) said that Microsoft must include emulation to use 6.x apps. 
 
Emulation, such as Rosetta, helped Apple bridge from PowerPC to x86. But the thing to remember is that the interface remained the same through Apple&#039;s platform migration. 
 
Emulation may not work for Windows Mobile, in that it is the interface that will need the most changes. The interfaces from the old WinMo 6.x  apps (designed for stylus) won&#039;t work with the new Zune-like interface of Windows Mobile 7. It seems obvious that every app will need some modification. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wishmaster89 (above) said that Microsoft must include emulation to use 6.x apps. </p>
<p>Emulation, such as Rosetta, helped Apple bridge from PowerPC to x86. But the thing to remember is that the interface remained the same through Apple&#039;s platform migration. </p>
<p>Emulation may not work for Windows Mobile, in that it is the interface that will need the most changes. The interfaces from the old WinMo 6.x  apps (designed for stylus) won&#039;t work with the new Zune-like interface of Windows Mobile 7. It seems obvious that every app will need some modification. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed M.</title>
		<link>http://wmpoweruser.com/windows-mobile-7-early-build-hands-on-review-not-compatible-with-old-apps/comment-page-1/#comment-78647</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 04:21:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wmpoweruser.com/?p=12237#comment-78647</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s the best thing that Microsoft has made Windows Mobile 7 incompatible with Windows Mobile 6.x. 
 
A really large proportion of the WM 6.x apps were unusable on capacitive screens, such as the HTC HD2. Those apps were originally designed for a stylus pen interface, and some were useless on the capacitive screen of the HD2. 
 
Microsoft must cut the stylus loose, and move the whole Windows Mobile OS and all its applications to the capacitive interface. The market demands capacitive screens. Resistive, stylus interfaces will simply fail to sell (which is what&#039;s happening now with 6.x). 
 
Whichever way it goes, most of the existing applications will need modification and interface changes. Maybe not a total rewrite, but it will be a major rewrite. We also know that WM7 will have a new kernel (CE6) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#039;s the best thing that Microsoft has made Windows Mobile 7 incompatible with Windows Mobile 6.x. </p>
<p>A really large proportion of the WM 6.x apps were unusable on capacitive screens, such as the HTC HD2. Those apps were originally designed for a stylus pen interface, and some were useless on the capacitive screen of the HD2. </p>
<p>Microsoft must cut the stylus loose, and move the whole Windows Mobile OS and all its applications to the capacitive interface. The market demands capacitive screens. Resistive, stylus interfaces will simply fail to sell (which is what&#039;s happening now with 6.x). </p>
<p>Whichever way it goes, most of the existing applications will need modification and interface changes. Maybe not a total rewrite, but it will be a major rewrite. We also know that WM7 will have a new kernel (CE6) </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Parrotlover77</title>
		<link>http://wmpoweruser.com/windows-mobile-7-early-build-hands-on-review-not-compatible-with-old-apps/comment-page-1/#comment-78589</link>
		<dc:creator>Parrotlover77</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 22:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wmpoweruser.com/?p=12237#comment-78589</guid>
		<description>I am highly highly skeptical. 
 
I think what we will see is more like a XP to Vista transitition. Some apps won&#8217;t work just due to OS changes (to be expected), but the bulk will because the underlying system is just a newer version of the old. 
 
Finally, Microsoft loves the developers. They really do! Announcing that all the developers&#8217; hard work for Windows Phone 6.5 and the app store is all for naught next year would just not at all be consistent with their tradition of &#8220;here&#8217;s our next OS, here&#8217;s how you make sure you are compatible&#8221; trend they set. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am highly highly skeptical. </p>
<p>I think what we will see is more like a XP to Vista transitition. Some apps won&rsquo;t work just due to OS changes (to be expected), but the bulk will because the underlying system is just a newer version of the old. </p>
<p>Finally, Microsoft loves the developers. They really do! Announcing that all the developers&rsquo; hard work for Windows Phone 6.5 and the app store is all for naught next year would just not at all be consistent with their tradition of &ldquo;here&rsquo;s our next OS, here&rsquo;s how you make sure you are compatible&rdquo; trend they set. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Parrotlover77</title>
		<link>http://wmpoweruser.com/windows-mobile-7-early-build-hands-on-review-not-compatible-with-old-apps/comment-page-1/#comment-78590</link>
		<dc:creator>Parrotlover77</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 22:25:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wmpoweruser.com/?p=12237#comment-78590</guid>
		<description>I am absolutely 100% sure that there will be apps made for WM6.x, WM5, and older that will not work well (or at all) on WM7. There are too many apps in the ecosystem and new features sometimes break old ones. It&#8217;s not intended, but it happens. Additionally, sometimes older APIs change with time. For example, WinCE 6, supporting true memory isolation and so on, breaks a ton of system-level apps written for WinCE 5 (every system app made for WM thus far). 
 
However,the bulk of apps will probably work. The ones that don&#8217;t will need to be tweaked, but not written from scratch. 
 
Microsoft is a business company. If they want to remain competitive with RIM, they need business apps. Are they going to rewrite the entire Pocket Office suite? Maybe, but it seems like a lot of extra work. 
 
Besides, Windows CE is incredibly mature and powerful and used on multiple platforms, from the XBox to rugged mobile devices, to high security devices, to, most famously, Windows Phone. Why would they change that when they were under the gun to begin with from a time perspective?  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am absolutely 100% sure that there will be apps made for WM6.x, WM5, and older that will not work well (or at all) on WM7. There are too many apps in the ecosystem and new features sometimes break old ones. It&rsquo;s not intended, but it happens. Additionally, sometimes older APIs change with time. For example, WinCE 6, supporting true memory isolation and so on, breaks a ton of system-level apps written for WinCE 5 (every system app made for WM thus far). </p>
<p>However,the bulk of apps will probably work. The ones that don&rsquo;t will need to be tweaked, but not written from scratch. </p>
<p>Microsoft is a business company. If they want to remain competitive with RIM, they need business apps. Are they going to rewrite the entire Pocket Office suite? Maybe, but it seems like a lot of extra work. </p>
<p>Besides, Windows CE is incredibly mature and powerful and used on multiple platforms, from the XBox to rugged mobile devices, to high security devices, to, most famously, Windows Phone. Why would they change that when they were under the gun to begin with from a time perspective?  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Parrotlover77</title>
		<link>http://wmpoweruser.com/windows-mobile-7-early-build-hands-on-review-not-compatible-with-old-apps/comment-page-1/#comment-78588</link>
		<dc:creator>Parrotlover77</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 22:24:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wmpoweruser.com/?p=12237#comment-78588</guid>
		<description>I call bullshit on this one.  Jesus, anybody can post anything on the internet.  I could just randomly tweet that WM7 is based off OS X and next thing you know it&#039;d be taken seriously on the rumor mill. 
 
As I said on another blog... 
 
A cornerstone at Microsoft is backwards compatibility. Look at the effort put into Windows 7. It&#8217;s actually more backward compatible than Vista with the integrated &#8220;XP Mode.&#8221;  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I call bullshit on this one.  Jesus, anybody can post anything on the internet.  I could just randomly tweet that WM7 is based off OS X and next thing you know it&#039;d be taken seriously on the rumor mill. </p>
<p>As I said on another blog&#8230; </p>
<p>A cornerstone at Microsoft is backwards compatibility. Look at the effort put into Windows 7. It&rsquo;s actually more backward compatible than Vista with the integrated &ldquo;XP Mode.&rdquo;  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drphysx</title>
		<link>http://wmpoweruser.com/windows-mobile-7-early-build-hands-on-review-not-compatible-with-old-apps/comment-page-1/#comment-78583</link>
		<dc:creator>drphysx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 21:46:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wmpoweruser.com/?p=12237#comment-78583</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s troubling is that that small companyMeizu managed to put a great UI onto WinCE6 within a pretty short time and it took Microsoft three years to put that disappointing WM6.5 UI onto WinCE5.2. 
 
I wonder what Microsoft has been doing all the time. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#039;s troubling is that that small companyMeizu managed to put a great UI onto WinCE6 within a pretty short time and it took Microsoft three years to put that disappointing WM6.5 UI onto WinCE5.2. </p>
<p>I wonder what Microsoft has been doing all the time. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: @Wishmaster89</title>
		<link>http://wmpoweruser.com/windows-mobile-7-early-build-hands-on-review-not-compatible-with-old-apps/comment-page-1/#comment-78570</link>
		<dc:creator>@Wishmaster89</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 20:19:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wmpoweruser.com/?p=12237#comment-78570</guid>
		<description>Hey if Meizu was able to write their OS based on CE6 and still use WM applications why MS wouldn&#039;t be able to do something like that. Few minutes ago I saw video showing Meizu M8 running FPSEce 0.10 and remember that it has capacitive multi-touch display. 
I think that final version of WM7 will support legacy applications. Either through emulation or virtual machine. Similar to what Eldar said. I won&#039;t judge it before seeing final version but for now it doesn&#039;t sound too promising... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey if Meizu was able to write their OS based on CE6 and still use WM applications why MS wouldn&#039;t be able to do something like that. Few minutes ago I saw video showing Meizu M8 running FPSEce 0.10 and remember that it has capacitive multi-touch display.<br />
I think that final version of WM7 will support legacy applications. Either through emulation or virtual machine. Similar to what Eldar said. I won&#039;t judge it before seeing final version but for now it doesn&#039;t sound too promising&#8230; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 8/20 queries in 0.009 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 453/459 objects using disk: basic

Served from: wmpoweruser.com @ 2012-05-25 07:26:04 -->
